On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c b/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> index 9ded17c..d9b4485 100644
> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,37)
> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3,11,0)
> static bool dev_supports_vlan_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> -#if defined(HAVE_VLAN_BUG_WORKAROUND)
> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,37)
> + return true;
Should this be greater than 2.6.37 instead of less than?
> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index d726390..0381002 100644
> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,38)
> #define netif_skb_features rpl_netif_skb_features
> netdev_features_t rpl_netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb);
Currently this function doesn't look at mpls_features. Should it for
things other than TSO?
> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/netdevice.c
> b/datapath/linux/compat/netdevice.c
> index 1dc5abf..d22fced 100644
> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/netdevice.c
> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/netdevice.c
> @@ -78,6 +83,9 @@ struct sk_buff *rpl_skb_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be16 skb_proto;
> struct sk_buff *skb_gso;
>
> + if (eth_p_mpls(skb->protocol))
> + type = ovs_skb_get_inner_protocol(skb);
> +
> while (type == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) {
> struct vlan_hdr *vh;
Is the ordering on this backwards given that we expect that VLANs can
be on the outside but not the other way around?
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
