Thanks for the review, pushed with the change suggested,
Jarno
On May 14, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:21:11PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> The terminology we used for subtable ordering ('splice', 'right
>> before') was inherited from an earlier use of a linked list, and
>> turned out to be confusing when applied to an array. Also, we only
>> ever move one subtable earlier or later within the array, so we can
>> simplify the code as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
>
> Each of the callers has an explicit test for to != from. Can we just
> move that into cls_subtable_cache_move()?
>
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
