On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:23:25PM +0300, Alexandru Copot wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Alexandru Copot <alex.miha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:39:32PM +0300, Alexandru Copot wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> >>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > diff --git a/lib/ofp-msgs.h b/lib/ofp-msgs.h
> >>> > index df7569e..b548f6b 100644
> >>> > --- a/lib/ofp-msgs.h
> >>> > +++ b/lib/ofp-msgs.h
> >>> > @@ -162,8 +162,10 @@ enum ofpraw {
> >>> >
> >>> > /* OFPT 1.0 (12): struct ofp_port_status, struct ofp10_phy_port. */
> >>> > OFPRAW_OFPT10_PORT_STATUS,
> >>> > - /* OFPT 1.1+ (12): struct ofp_port_status, struct ofp11_port. */
> >>> > + /* OFPT 1.1-1.3 (12): struct ofp_port_status, struct ofp11_port. */
> >>> > OFPRAW_OFPT11_PORT_STATUS,
> >>> > + /* OFPT 1.4+ (12): struct ofp_port_status, struct ofp14_port,
> >>> > uint8_t[8][]. */
> >>> > + OFPRAW_OFPT14_PORT_STATUS,
> >>> >
> >>> > /* OFPT 1.0 (13): struct ofp10_packet_out, uint8_t[]. */
> >>> > OFPRAW_OFPT10_PACKET_OUT,
> >>> > @@ -360,8 +362,10 @@ enum ofpraw {
> >>> >
> >>> > /* OFPST 1.0 (13): struct ofp10_phy_port[]. */
> >>> > OFPRAW_OFPST10_PORT_DESC_REPLY,
> >>> > - /* OFPST 1.1+ (13): struct ofp11_port[]. */
> >>> > + /* OFPST 1.1-1.3 (13): struct ofp11_port[]. */
> >>> > OFPRAW_OFPST11_PORT_DESC_REPLY,
> >>> > + /* OFPST 1.4+ (13): uint8_t[8][]. */
> >>> > + OFPRAW_OFPST14_PORT_DESC_REPLY,
> >>> >
> >>> > /* Nicira extension messages.
> >>> > *
> >>> > @@ -471,7 +475,8 @@ enum ofptype {
> >>> > * OFPRAW_OFPT11_FLOW_REMOVED.
> >>> > * OFPRAW_NXT_FLOW_REMOVED. */
> >>> > OFPTYPE_PORT_STATUS, /* OFPRAW_OFPT10_PORT_STATUS.
> >>> > - * OFPRAW_OFPT11_PORT_STATUS. */
> >>> > + * OFPRAW_OFPT11_PORT_STATUS.
> >>> > + * OFPRAW_OFPT14_PORT_STATUS. */
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Now that there is OFPRAW_OFPT14_PORT_STATUS, encode_port_status()
> >>> should use it for OF1.4 instead of OFPRAW_OFPT11_PORT_STATUS. Otherwise,
> >>> now we get an abort.
> >>
> >> Noticing something minor must mean that you are paying pretty good
> >> attention to the patches. Which ones have you reviewed? Do you expect
> >> to have more comments?
> >
> > It was easy to notice because the switch crashes when connecting
> > to an OF1.4 controller. I mostly read the patches regarding 1.4 features,
> > until 14/20 and they seem good, couldn't find anything else.
> >
> >> I ask because getting reviews is all that is blocking these patches. I
> >> think that they are decently written, so I'm just waiting for someone to
> >> look them over.
> >
> > I'll try to look over the rest of them.
>
> The rest of the patches look fine, too. The only thing I'm not sure about
> is the metaflow stuff because I'm not familiar with it.
Thanks! It looks like Jarno took a look at those patches.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
