On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:15:46AM -0700, Alex Wang wrote:
> Commit 3e912ffcbb (netdev: Add 'change_seq' back to netdev.) added per-
> netdev change number for indicating status change.  Future commits used
> this change number to optimize the netdev status update to database.
> However, the work also introduced the bug in the following scenario:
> 
> - assume interface eth0 has address 1.2.3.4, eth1 has adddress 10.0.0.1.
> - assume tunnel port p1 is set with remote_ip=10.0.0.5.
> - after setup, 'ovs-vsctl list interface p1 status' should show the
>   'tunnel_egress_iface="eth1"'.
> - now if the address of eth1 is change to 0 via 'ifconfig eth1 0'.
> - expectedly, after change, 'ovs-vsctl list interface p1 status' should
>   show the 'tunnel_egress_iface="eth0"'
> 
> However, 'tunnel_egress_iface' will not be updated on current master.
> This is in that, the 'netdev-vport' module corresponding to p1 does
> not react to routing related changes.
> 
> To fix the bug, this commit adds a change sequence number in the route-
> table module and makes netdev-vport check the sequence number for
> tunnel status update.
> 
> Bug #1240626
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com>

Assuming you tested it and it fixed the problem,
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to