On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Pritesh Kothari (pritkoth)
> <pritk...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jesse,
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/etherdevice.h 
>>>> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/etherdevice.h
>>>> index 556729d..c6e8e92 100644
>>>> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/etherdevice.h
>>>> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/etherdevice.h
>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static inline int eth_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, 
>>>> void *p)
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>> 
>>>> +#ifndef HAVE_ETHER_ADDR_COPY
>>>> static inline void ether_addr_copy(u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
>>> 
>>> Now that we have a configure check, I think it is probably cleaner to
>>> move this out of the version check.
>> 
>> maybe i am mistaken, but i don’t see any version checks here ?
> 
> Sorry, I was mistaken. I thought that the version check from the
> previous function continued down to this one.

no worries, fixed other stuff will send in v5 soon. thanks for the review.

Regards,
Pritesh
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to