Yes, thanks. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:54:31PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > Something like this, right? > > diff --git a/tests/atlocal.in b/tests/atlocal.in > index 06e7384..60f3dbf 100644 > --- a/tests/atlocal.in > +++ b/tests/atlocal.in > @@ -78,3 +78,13 @@ FreeBSD|NetBSD) > LOOPBACK_INTERFACE=lo0 > ;; > esac > + > +# Check for MINGW platform. > +case `uname` in > +MINGW*) > + IS_WIN32="yes" > + ;; > +*) > + IS_WIN32="no" > + ;; > +esac > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:04:08AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty <gshe...@nicira.com> > >> --- > >> tests/atlocal.in | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/tests/atlocal.in b/tests/atlocal.in > >> index 06e7384..8267554 100644 > >> --- a/tests/atlocal.in > >> +++ b/tests/atlocal.in > >> @@ -77,4 +77,7 @@ Linux) > >> FreeBSD|NetBSD) > >> LOOPBACK_INTERFACE=lo0 > >> ;; > >> +MINGW*) > >> + IS_WIN32="yes" > >> + ;; > >> esac > > > > This seems a little awkward as an addition to code that mainly gets the > > name of the loopback interface. I'd put it in a separate case > > statement, and set IS_WIN32=no in the other cases. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
