Is there any particular reason why 'base' cannot be used as reference
for computing offsets, instead of 'frame'?
Thanks,
Florin
On 04/02/2014 07:59 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
struct ofpbuf {
void *base; /* First byte of allocated space. */
uint32_t allocated; /* Number of bytes allocated. */
uint32_t size; /* Number of bytes in use. */
void *data; /* First byte actually in use. */
- void *l2; /* Link-level header. */
- uint16_t l2_5_ofs; /* MPLS label stack offset from l2, or
+ void *frame; /* Packet frame start, or NULL. */
+ uint16_t l2_5_ofs; /* MPLS label stack offset from 'packet', or
* UINT16_MAX */
- uint16_t l3_ofs; /* Network-level header offset from l2, or
- * UINT16_MAX. */
- uint16_t l4_ofs; /* Transport-level header offset from l2, or
- UINT16_MAX. */
+ uint16_t l3_ofs; /* Network-level header offset from 'packet',
+ or UINT16_MAX. */
+ uint16_t l4_ofs; /* Transport-level header offset from 'packet',
+ or UINT16_MAX. */
enum ofpbuf_source source; /* Source of memory allocated as 'base'. */
struct list list_node; /* Private list element for use by owner. */
};
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
