On 03/27/14 at 07:17am, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 03/27/14 07:02, Thomas Graf wrote: > >But wouldn't you want to introduce an additional ndo to > >cover these? > > We could - I just find it distracting at the current thread > of discussion (the openwrt folks for example dont need any > or most of that). > > >What speaks against going with what Jiri proposes and adjust > >& extend as needed as we go along? > > > > I was hoping we knock these issue one at a time. The noise right > now is around ports and stacking of ports etc. Which in my > opinion is an easier topic to handle. > Jiri's patches on this can always come back in the discussion > later.
It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
