On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:52:48PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote: > Thanks for the reference. It provides the relevant background, especially > on memory_order_consume. > > BTW, the example has an unfamiliar syntax, p -< next (Its usage looks > like p -> next) Is this something new?
I think that's just a typo. I'm not aware of any "-<" operator. > Looking forward to the revision. Your implementation is much smaller than > the kernel RCU library. I think it will also be simpler to use. I hope so. For me, the big question is whether the thread that calls postponed functions is going to be able to keep up in worst-case situations. If not, we'll have to call some postponed callbacks when a thread quiesces. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
