On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:36:07AM +0000, thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote: > I understand the ideas behind generic l3 vports (Lori's patches), but I > don't clearly see how NSH fits in the picture, apart from the fact that > NSH has to cooperate with the tunneling code. It does not seem to me why > NSH patches would provide generic code for non-Ethernet tunnels.
I haven't reviewed the patches yet. I don't really know what's in there. I know that Lori is working on support for ports that carry L3, and my high-level suggestion is to coordinate with him. > By the way, I find the 'non-Ethernet' tunnel term much more appropriate > than "L3" vports. Why? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
