Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
---
I've heard term in the context of using a switch to "bless" traffic.
Adding this wording makes it easier to search for the relevant FAQ
entry.
---
FAQ | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index a08d65c..6c79efe 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -1403,9 +1403,9 @@ A: Yes, OpenFlow requires a switch to ignore attempts to
send a packet
even be convenient, e.g. it is often the desired behavior in a flow
that forwards a packet to several ports ("floods" the packet).
- Sometimes one really needs to send a packet out its ingress port.
- In this case, output to OFPP_IN_PORT, which in ovs-ofctl syntax is
- expressed as just "in_port", e.g.:
+ Sometimes one really needs to send a packet out its ingress port
+ ("hairpin"). In this case, output to OFPP_IN_PORT, which in
+ ovs-ofctl syntax is expressed as just "in_port", e.g.:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=2,actions=in_port
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
