On Dec 30, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

> In the end, my goal here is to provide a useful abstraction and a
> simple implementation that is likely to be correct.  Then, later, if
> profiling shows that this is an actual bottleneck, we can optimize
> it.  But I don't want to spend a bunch of time optimizing code that I
> don't even know is important.

Would using a single atomic int be worse than using an array of locks? At least 
it would be simpler and obviously correct?

  Jarno

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to