On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:49:40AM -0800, Alex Wang wrote:
> Both patches look good to me,
> 
> One comment below,
> 
> 
> > @@ -4432,57 +4432,38 @@ netdev_stats_from_rtnl_link_stats(struct
> > netdev_stats *dst,
> >  static int
> >  get_stats_via_netlink(const struct netdev *netdev_, struct netdev_stats
> > *stats)
> >  {
> > -    /* Policy for RTNLGRP_LINK messages.
> > -     *
> > -     * There are *many* more fields in these messages, but currently we
> > only
> > -     * care about these fields. */
> > -    static const struct nl_policy rtnlgrp_link_policy[] = {
> > -        [IFLA_IFNAME] = { .type = NL_A_STRING, .optional = false },
> > -        [IFLA_STATS] = { .type = NL_A_UNSPEC, .optional = true,
> > -                         .min_len = sizeof(struct rtnl_link_stats) },
> > -    };
> > -
> >      struct ofpbuf request;
> >      struct ofpbuf *reply;
> > -    struct ifinfomsg *ifi;
> > -    struct nlattr *attrs[ARRAY_SIZE(rtnlgrp_link_policy)];
> > -    int ifindex;
> >      int error;
> >
> > -    error = get_ifindex(netdev_, &ifindex);
> > -    if (error) {
> > -        return error;
> > -    }
> > -
> >      ofpbuf_init(&request, 0);
> > -    nl_msg_put_nlmsghdr(&request, sizeof *ifi, RTM_GETLINK,
> > NLM_F_REQUEST);
> > -    ifi = ofpbuf_put_zeros(&request, sizeof *ifi);
> > -    ifi->ifi_family = PF_UNSPEC;
> > -    ifi->ifi_index = ifindex;
> > +    nl_msg_put_nlmsghdr(&request,
> > +                        sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) + NL_ATTR_SIZE(IFNAMSIZ),
> > +                        RTM_GETLINK, NLM_F_REQUEST);
> > +    ofpbuf_put_zeros(&request, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg));
> > +    nl_msg_put_string(&request, IFLA_IFNAME, netdev_get_name(netdev_));
> >
> 
> 
> Why do we do "sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) + NL_ATTR_SIZE(IFNAMSIZ)"
> instead of "sizeof(struct ifinfomsg)"  or  "sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) +
> sizeof(struct nlattr) + NL_ATTR_SIZE(IFNAMSIZ) " ?

NL_ATTR_SIZE includes the size of a struct nlattr:
    #define NL_ATTR_SIZE(PAYLOAD_SIZE) (NLA_HDRLEN + NLA_ALIGN(PAYLOAD_SIZE))

> The "nl_msg_put_string(&request, IFLA_IFNAME, netdev_get_name(netdev_));"
> will realloc the "reqest", since we also need to put "struct nlattr".

I think that space is included.

Thanks for the review!  I'm going to push this in a minute.  (If I'm
wrong about the size calculation, we can fix that later.)
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to