On 11/25/13 at 01:23pm, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> > index 95d4424..3f1fb87 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
>
> I'm a little worried that this introduces some quirks to the interface. Such
> as:
>
> > @@ -1190,6 +1185,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> > genl_info *info)
> > struct vport *vport;
> > struct ovs_net *ovs_net;
> > int err, i;
> > + bool allocated = false;
> >
> > err = -EINVAL;
> > if (!a[OVS_DP_ATTR_NAME] || !a[OVS_DP_ATTR_UPCALL_PID])
>
> This requires that DP_CMD_SET supply an OVS_DP_ATTR_UPCALL_PID
> although I don't think that it's really necessary. In fact, we used to
> completely ignore that field on SET since it's really only useful on
> datapath creation and can otherwise be done more naturally through the
> vport interface.
It's a theoretical exercise since nobody is using OVS_DP_CMD_SET
but I agree, it should be optional in the update path. I'll update
the patch.
> > @@ -1197,11 +1193,26 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct genl_info *info)
> >
> > ovs_lock();
> >
> > + dp = lookup_datapath(sock_net(skb->sk), info->userhdr, info->attrs);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(dp)) {
> > + if (info->nlhdr->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)
> > + goto update;
>
> Conversely, this won't respect the UPCALL_PID field, which I would
> expect it to since I think NLM_F_REPLACE should be roughly equivalent
> to a delete and create. I believe that's the only field that is
> missing although it seems easy to have the same problem as others are
> added in the future.
It's up to us to define that.
What the patch proposes is what OVS has been doing already: Try to
find a datapath with matching name and reuse it. Otherwise create
a new data path. Disregard UPCALL_PID.
As you state above, the upcall pid can be modified through the vport
interface which in my opinion is the correct way to modify it if
needed.
I have no problem with adding upcall pid overwrite logic to the
NLM_F_REPLACE path but it _changes_ the existing semantics in
terms of "opening" a datapath.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
