> On Nov 26, 2013, at 9:23 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > > Ben previously indicated that he would like to stick with > the OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_MASK name. With that in mind perhaps it > would be best to put a comment above OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_MASK noting > that its has a different name but the same value in OpenFlow1.3+
Why not have both names? Jarno _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
