On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:28:31AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:33:31AM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:13:17AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:15:58PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:37:58AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:51:02AM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > > > > > While updating the packages to 2.0.0 I found that the build fails on > > > > > > PPC. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not an expert on PPC arch, but I think it doesn't support > > > > > > atomic > > > > > > operations of 8 bytes (64bit) on 32bit system, then there is no GCC > > > > > > built-in[1] for those cases which breaks the build. > > > > > > > > > > I only see build failures in the test-atomic program. That's a good > > > > > sign that we only use these 8-byte atomic operations in the test > > > > > program, not in real code. Are there other build failures? (Does > > > > > "make > > > > > vswitchd/ovs-vswitchd" succeed?) > > > > > > > > I've applied the patch below commenting out the problematic ones > > > > in test-atomic to work around and I was able to build the rpms. > > > > So, yeah, that's the only issue as far as I can see. > > > > > > Did you run the OVS testsuite? Any failures? > > > > Yes, see below and the attached file testsuite.log. > > In that case, there's significantly more going on than just 8-byte > atomic operations in tests. If you have time to dig into the > problems, please go ahead, otherwise I will look next week or the week > after. You're saying that the other failures in the testsuite.log are somehow related to the 8-byte atomic operations?
I am seeing some tests failing on x86_64 as well, 34/1328. They are 306~313, 1136, 1138~1162. I will be off for 2 weeks starting next week. I could help you or dig more into this when I get back. Thanks again, fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
