On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:53:21AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 25 October 2013 22:10, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > OFPQT_NONE was removed from later standards because it was never defined > > and it didn't make any sense to define it (why would you define a > > property to say there are no properties?). > > > > I can leave OFPQT_EXPERIMENTER defined if you like, it doesn't hurt > > anything. > > > > I'm not too fussed---the reason I asked is more to get an idea for what is > usually done in this case.
I added it back, it's reasonable to have it there. I'll apply these soon. Thanks! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
