On Oct 23, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:20:44PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> > > Thanks, I applied this to master. > > I didn't know what you meant by this, perhaps we should clarify it? >> [...] Switch behavior when setting >> +\fIttl\fR to zero is not well specified, though.
Currently, zero is a valid value for a set action, but it is up to interpretation weather the switch should send the packet to the controller when the ttl is set to zero (as is the case for dec ttl action. It might make sense to change the behavior to return an invalid value error for the set TTL actions, as there should be no reason for a controller to set a TTL to zero? Jarno _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
