On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:49:06PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@valinux.co.jp>
... > + This requires the following. > + - Change the default table-miss action (in the absense of table-miss > + entry) from packet_in to drop for OF1.3+. Decide what to do if > + a switch is configured to support multiple OF versions. > + - Distinguish table-miss flow entry and make its packet_in reason > + OFPR_NO_MATCH. (OFPR_TABLE_MISS for OF1.4) > + - Avoid a table-miss flow entry matching to packets if there are > + ordinary flow entries with priority 0 in the table. I.e. The > + table-miss flow entry should have lesser effective priority. I wasn't aware that the table-miss flow entry was supposed to have lower effective priority than other flow entries with table 0. Does the text of the standard say this or imply this somewhere? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
