OK, I moved that call too.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:24:09AM -0700, Alex Wang wrote:
> looks good to me, since the "reimplement coverage/show" patch is in, should
> also call coverage_run() beforehand,
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>
> > time_poll() calls log_poll_interval(), which in some circumstances calls
> > coverage_log(). Before this commit, time_poll() also called
> > coverage_clear() after log_poll_interval(). This made sense before commit
> > 857165b5fd26 (coverage: Make thread-safe.), because coverage_log() would
> > log the most recent main loop's coverage counters separately and calling
> > coverage_clear() beforehand would zero out those counters. However, it
> > doesn't make sense any longer because the most recent loop's counters are
> > no longer separately logged and in fact this practice now means that the
> > most recent loop's counters are omitted from the logged counters.
> >
> > Therefore, this commit moves the call to coverage_clear() earlier, so that
> > the most recent loop's counters are included.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> > ---
> > lib/timeval.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/timeval.c b/lib/timeval.c
> > index 223ed30..bd73f35 100644
> > --- a/lib/timeval.c
> > +++ b/lib/timeval.c
> > @@ -230,10 +230,10 @@ time_poll(struct pollfd *pollfds, int n_pollfds,
> > long long int timeout_when,
> > int retval;
> >
> > time_init();
> > + coverage_clear();
> > if (*last_wakeup) {
> > log_poll_interval(*last_wakeup);
> > }
> > - coverage_clear();
> > start = time_msec();
> >
> > timeout_when = MIN(timeout_when, deadline);
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
