Whoops, that was probably me. Acked-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>
Thanks, --Justin On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > This field has always been fully maskable, but the comment here has always > said that it is non-maskable. > > EXT-101. > CC: Jean Tourrilhes <j...@hpl.hp.com> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > --- > include/openflow/nicira-ext.h | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/openflow/nicira-ext.h b/include/openflow/nicira-ext.h > index de5ff6a..ca272fd 100644 > --- a/include/openflow/nicira-ext.h > +++ b/include/openflow/nicira-ext.h > @@ -1717,8 +1717,9 @@ OFP_ASSERT(sizeof(struct nx_action_output_reg) == 24); > * > * Format: 20-bit IPv6 flow label in least-significant bits. > * > - * Masking: Not maskable. */ > -#define NXM_NX_IPV6_LABEL NXM_HEADER (0x0001, 27, 4) > + * Masking: Fully maskable. */ > +#define NXM_NX_IPV6_LABEL NXM_HEADER (0x0001, 27, 4) > +#define NXM_NX_IPV6_LABEL_W NXM_HEADER_W(0x0001, 27, 4) > > /* The ECN of the IP header. > * > -- > 1.7.10.4 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
