After second look, I do not think this locking is required.
Discard this patch.

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:
> flow-mask and mask-list can be accessed from rcu call-back.
> Following patch guard it with ovs_lock.
>
> Found by code inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>
> ---
>  datapath/flow.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/datapath/flow.c b/datapath/flow.c
> index 29122af..fe1f975 100644
> --- a/datapath/flow.c
> +++ b/datapath/flow.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,9 @@ static void flow_tbl_destroy_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>  {
>         struct flow_table *table = container_of(rcu, struct flow_table, rcu);
>
> +       ovs_lock();
>         __flow_tbl_destroy(table);
> +       ovs_unlock();
>  }
>
>  void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(struct flow_table *table, bool deferred)
> --
> 1.7.1
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to