Basically the result of gettid(). There's more than one thread ID?
Ethan
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Which thread ID do you mean?
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:55:26AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Does it make sense to use the thread ID instead? That way it'd be
>> clear if some reconfiguration happens that destroys and recreates
>> them.
>>
>> Ethan
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>> > This may occasionally make debugging easier.
>> >
>> > Suggested-by: Keith Amidon <ke...@nicira.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>> > ---
>> > ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c | 3 ++-
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
>> > index 54f441b..1605c63 100644
>> > --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
>> > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
>> > @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ udpif_miss_handler(void *arg)
>> > struct list misses = LIST_INITIALIZER(&misses);
>> > struct handler *handler = arg;
>> >
>> > - set_subprogram_name("miss_handler");
>> > + set_subprogram_name("miss_handler_%td",
>> > + handler - handler->udpif->handlers);
>> > for (;;) {
>> > size_t i;
>> >
>> > --
>> > 1.7.10.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dev mailing list
>> > dev@openvswitch.org
>> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
