Sounds good, thanks.

Ethan

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews.  I pushed to master and branch-2.0.  None of
> these seem to apply to branch-1.11.
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:57:01PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Acked-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>> > Ordinarily a miniflow will use its inline_values if its values can fit, but
>> > there is nothing to prevent a small number of values from being stored
>> > in malloc()'d memory.  If this happened, then miniflow_move() would leak
>> > memory.  This commit fixes the problem.
>> >
>> > This is a hypothetical problem.  I haven't seen it in practice.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>> > ---
>> >  lib/flow.c |    6 +++---
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/lib/flow.c b/lib/flow.c
>> > index 0e7c493..9ab1961 100644
>> > --- a/lib/flow.c
>> > +++ b/lib/flow.c
>> > @@ -1141,10 +1141,10 @@ miniflow_clone(struct miniflow *dst, const struct 
>> > miniflow *src)
>> >  void
>> >  miniflow_move(struct miniflow *dst, struct miniflow *src)
>> >  {
>> > -    int n = miniflow_n_values(src);
>> > -    if (n <= MINI_N_INLINE) {
>> > +    if (src->values == src->inline_values) {
>> >          dst->values = dst->inline_values;
>> > -        memcpy(dst->values, src->values, n * sizeof *dst->values);
>> > +        memcpy(dst->values, src->values,
>> > +               miniflow_n_values(src) * sizeof *dst->values);
>> >      } else {
>> >          dst->values = src->values;
>> >      }
>> > --
>> > 1.7.10.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dev mailing list
>> > dev@openvswitch.org
>> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to