The tunnel lookup uses the skb_mark as part of the port find process
but it isn't unmasked along with the other fields. This adds it to
the list of significant fields.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
index 18b0257..6672b46 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
@@ -2327,6 +2327,7 @@ xlate_actions(struct xlate_in *xin, struct xlate_out
*xout)
if (tnl_port_should_receive(&ctx.xin->flow)) {
memset(&wc->masks.tunnel, 0xff, sizeof wc->masks.tunnel);
+ memset(&wc->masks.skb_mark, 0xff, sizeof wc->masks.skb_mark);
}
if (ctx.xbridge->has_netflow) {
netflow_mask_wc(flow, wc);
--
1.8.1.2
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
