Thanks, it makes sense,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:17:37AM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > > Also, for confirmation, we do not need to guarantee the thread safety > > of coverage counters, since they are not meant to be perfectly accurate, > > right? > > The coverage counters should probably become per-thread. I haven't > done anything about them yet because they'll do minimal harm. >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
