Thanks Ben, it makes sense. I'm all good with this patch.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:44:54PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there requirement that the "* data_" must not be free'ed before > > > > asynchronously written to 'fd'? > > > > > > That's right too. (Do you see a mistake here regarding that rule?) > > > > I didn't see any mistake, since this has not been used. But would it > > make sense to state that in the comment of "async_append_write()"? > > Oh, I'm sorry, I misread your question. Let me try again. > > The caller may modify or free the copy of the data that it provides, > because async_append_write() makes its own copy inside ap->byteq. >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
