Thanks for your quickly reply.

I have downloaded the codes of ovs-reviews-thread in your "reviews" repository 
and doing some test on new patches.

In my test, the multithreaded feature doesn't work and there is no change on 
ovs-vswitchd threads. Some results of executing "ps -ef | grep ovs" as follows:

linux-kKoZfU:/mnt/sdb/ovs-reviews-threads # ps -ef |grep ovs
root     24039     1  0 09:27 ?        00:00:00 ovsdb-server 
/usr/local/etc/ovs-vswitchd.conf.db 
--remote=punix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock 
--remote=db:Open_vSwitch,manager_options --pidfile --detach --log-file
root     24042     1  0 09:27 ?        00:00:00 ovs-vswitchd 
unix:/usr/local/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock --pidfile --detach --log-file
root     24043 24042  0 09:27 ?        00:00:00 ovs-vswitchd: worker process 
for pid 24042

Then I tried to found threads in procfs info of ovs-vswitchd process with pid 
24042. The result of executing "ls /proc/24042/task/" as follows:

linux-kKoZfU:/mnt/sdb/llj/ovs-reviews-threads # ls -l /proc/24042/task/
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 6 root root 0 Jun 27 09:30 24042

I can't find any place in code where the added function xpthread_create() is 
called. To make ovs multithreaded, So I expect data structures added in new 
patches to be used by existing code in the repository.

Would you like to share some thoughts on that test results?

Regards,
Jerry

On 2013/6/26 23:32, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:46:38PM +0800, jerry wrote:
>> I noticed that you have sent out 01~09 of 11 patches on files named
>> ovs-thread.c and ovs-thread.h.
> 
> I sent all of them.
> 
>> But I can't find the last two patch of them. 
> 
> Look in patchwork or in my "reviews" repository:
>         https://github.com/blp/ovs-reviews/branches
> 
>> Also the defined functions and data structures are not used in latest
>> open vswitch codes from git repository.
> 
> Why would you expect data structures added in new patches to be used by
> existing code in the repository?
> 
>> Is your work to make ovs multi-threaded? What's the train of thought
>> on the work?  In my guess, maybe you separate the work of ofproto run
>> or run_fast from ovs-vswitchd process and run the work as a single
>> thread. Is that right?
> 
> That's roughly the idea.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to