From: David Stevens <dlstev...@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:46:42 -0400
>> From: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>
>
>
>> @@ -1205,13 +1222,13 @@ static netdev_tx_t vxlan_xmit(struct sk_buff
>> *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> skb1 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> if (skb1) {
>> - rc1 = vxlan_xmit_one(skb1, dev, rdst, did_rsc);
>> + rc1 = __vxlan_xmit(skb1, dev, rdst, did_rsc);
>> if (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
>> rc = rc1;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - rc1 = vxlan_xmit_one(skb, dev, rdst0, did_rsc);
>> + rc1 = __vxlan_xmit(skb, dev, rdst0, did_rsc);
>> if (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
>> rc = rc1;
>> return rc;
>
> You're changing the name of the function that sends a
> packet to one destination because you think "__vxlan_xmit"
> is more descriptive than "vxlan_xmit_one" ?
Agreed, this is rediculous.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
