On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:10:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:51:15PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:31:58AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:56:37PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > I made the following comment on v1, did you do anything about it?
> > > > 
> > > > > Also, the action parser in ofp-actions.def rejects any pop_mpls action
> > > > > with an MPLS ethertype attached, in two places.  We should fix that.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for not being clearer.
> > > 
> > > As per my note below I have a patch that removes restrictions on
> > > the use of MPLS push and pop. This includes removing the
> > > code that rejects pop_mpls actions with an MPLS ethertype attached.
> > > 
> > > I now have that change working and I will post it shortly.
> > 
> > It wasn't shortly, but I have posted it as
> > 
> > [PATCH] Allow multiple levels of MPLS push and pop
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> I'm wondering if you could take a moment to review this.

Based on the devel/mpls-multi-push-and-pop branch it has multiple
prerequisites.  I'm starting to take a look at those.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to