Now I've tried with the latest 1.4 code, but it still produces these message intermittently. Here are some examples:

May 3 16:32:27 localhost ovs-vswitchd: 00093|ofproto_dpif|WARN|unexpected flow from datapath in_port(1),eth(src=00:21:1b:f3:63:45,dst=00:e0:ed:26:a9:bc),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.80.2.155,dst=10.80.227.83,proto=6,tos=0x10,ttl=62,frag=no),tcp(src=53495,dst=22) May 3 16:32:28 localhost ovs-vswitchd: 00094|ofproto_dpif|WARN|unexpected flow from datapath in_port(1),eth(src=00:21:1b:f3:63:45,dst=00:e0:ed:26:a9:bc),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.80.2.155,dst=10.80.227.83,proto=6,tos=0x10,ttl=62,frag=no),tcp(src=53495,dst=22) May 3 16:32:29 localhost ovs-vswitchd: 00095|ofproto_dpif|WARN|unexpected flow from datapath in_port(1),eth(src=00:21:1b:f3:63:45,dst=00:e0:ed:26:a9:bc),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.80.2.155,dst=10.80.227.83,proto=6,tos=0x10,ttl=62,frag=no),tcp(src=53495,dst=22) May 3 16:32:30 localhost ovs-vswitchd: 00096|ofproto_dpif|WARN|unexpected flow from datapath in_port(1),eth(src=00:21:1b:f3:63:45,dst=00:e0:ed:26:a9:bc),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=10.80.2.155,dst=10.80.227.83,proto=6,tos=0x10,ttl=62,frag=no),tcp(src=53495,dst=22)

Regards,

Zoli

On 30/04/13 23:16, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Commit fdd80c39b1822db6c8b5c (datapath: Check gso_type for correct
sk_buff in queue_gso_packets().) could be related, but I am not
certain.  It's the mostly likely known-fixed problem I see in a quick
scan of branch-1.4 commits following cc8ccb5.

Could you provide a log excerpt that includes some of these messages?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:08:20AM +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Hi,

The latest commit we included in XS 6.1 is cc8ccb5 (26 Jun 2012
14:43:54: lib: Do not assume sig_atomic_t is int)

Regards,

Zoli

On 25/04/13 19:25, Ben Pfaff wrote:
It's not "normal".  It indicates a bug, although if they are only seen
occasionally it is not a big deal.  What commit is the original XS 6.1
OVS based on?

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:48:32PM +0100, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Hi,

Thanks, I've made my comments on that thread. Another related
question came to my mind: I've seen from time to time some
"ofproto_dpif|WARN|unexpected flow from datapath" messages, not just
with these patches but with the original XS 6.1 ovs. I couldn't see
a pattern in the type of flows. Is this normal?


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to