On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:49:35AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> <jarno.rajaha...@nsn.com> wrote:
> > Another thing that I came to think only when reading Ben's new tutorial:
> > Output to the input port is skipped. This would be a problem if you only
> > have one generic flow based GRE port (as enabled by the last patch in
> > this series), and you should forward GRE input to another GRE output.
> > This could be fixed by always allowing output (in xlate_output_action())
> > to a tunnel that has cfg.ip_dst_flow set, even if the output port is the
> > same as the input port. Thoughts?
> 
> I know that Ben was thinking about ways to relax this check anyways,
> so it might be good to see how that fits with this.

I've proposed adding a new output action that doesn't have this
check.  I don't think it's a good idea to change the semantics of
OFPAT_OUTPUT because that is bound to cause confusion.

I'd take a patch to add such an action (using the NXAST_* space or
some other vendor space).
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to