On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 16:17 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > On 02/05/13 17:09, agya naila wrote: > > > Does any one have test this script performance with Xen live migration? > > > what is the performance result compared with brctl. I hope any body > want > > > to share it. I want to use this script with my Xen 4.2.1 using xend/xm > > > toostack. > > > > I have not tried it myself, but I'm not sure this will play nice with > > xend/xm, AFAIK xend had a race regarding device destruction and hotplug > > execution, that's one of the points why we call hotplug scripts from > > libxl directly instead of calling them from udev. Any reason to use xm > > instead of xl? > Thank you Roger, actually I have some short experiment using Remus to enables HA and I read Remus in xl still in experiment without support for network or disk buffering so there is no best choice for me right now instead roll back to the xm toolstack. Indeed, I only wrote this script for xl and did not consider xend at > all. > > Thank you Ian > Ian. > > > Best Regards, Agya
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
