On 22/04/13 19:05, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:46 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >>> + offline) >> >> Don't you need a "remove" here? >> >> remove|offline) >> ... >> >> Or it doesn't matter because when the tap device is destroyed everything >> is automagically cleaned? > > Even if that were the case I wouldn't want to rely on it, so we should > try and clean up explicitly. > > Is this tap devices which only generates add/remove and not > online/offline? Do you happen to know the sequence of events for both > types of device?
It's all in libxl_linux.c, libxl__hotplug_nic in case you want to take a look at the implementation, the sequence of events for HVM guests should be: - online vif - add tap ... - offline vif - remove tap _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
