On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:16:52 -0700 > >> OVS locking was recently changed to have private OVS lock which >> simplified overall locking. Therefore there is no need to have >> another global genl lock to protect OVS data structures. Following >> patch uses of lockless genl family for OVS. This also allows >> more granual OVS locking using ovs_mutex for protecting OVS data >> structures, which gives more consurrencey. E.g multiple genl >> operations OVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE can run in parallel, etc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> > > Three problems with this submission: > > 1) When you resubmit a patch that's part of a series, you must repost > the entire series. > > 2) When you post a new version of a patch, you must list (after the > "---" delimiter) what has changed in this version. > > 3) When you post a new version of a patch, you must indicate this by > putting "[PATCH v2 ...] ...", for example, in the Subject line.
I thought I just need to post patch that was changed. Let me send updated series again. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
