Thanks, I applied this to master.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:32:22AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks.
>
> --Justin
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>
> > The claim that there's only a single implementation was long obsolete.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> > ---
> > lib/netdev.h | 9 +++++----
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/netdev.h b/lib/netdev.h
> > index a691d70..13105ee 100644
> > --- a/lib/netdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/netdev.h
> > @@ -26,11 +26,12 @@
> > extern "C" {
> > #endif
> >
> > -/* Generic interface to network devices.
> > +/* Generic interface to network devices ("netdev"s).
> > *
> > - * Currently, there is a single implementation of this interface that
> > supports
> > - * Linux. The interface should be generic enough to be implementable on
> > other
> > - * operating systems as well. */
> > + * Every port on a switch must have a corresponding netdev that must
> > minimally
> > + * support a few operations, such as the ability to read the netdev's MTU.
> > + * The PORTING file at the top of the source tree has more information in
> > the
> > + * "Writing a netdev Provider" section. */
> >
> > struct ofpbuf;
> > struct in_addr;
> > --
> > 1.7.2.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
