It's still in review. I think it's only necessary because it changes the name of the dest port attribute and there's no point in causing compatibility problems if we can avoid them. I think everything should be functional with the existing patches on master though.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> wrote: > I'm doing the backport now. Whats the name of Pravin's patch you're > referring to? Is that on master, or still in review? > > Ethan > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) > <kmest...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Looks good to me with the following incremental which I've applied. >> >> I'll merge >> >> shortly. Thanks for doing this work Kyle. >> > >> > We should make sure that whatever patches are necessary for getting >> > VXLAN to work again also get applied to branch-1.10 in addition to >> > master. >> >> Off the top of my head, we need the 4 patches of mine which Ben applied, >> along >> with this one which Ethan is reviewing. We also need Pravin's patch, which >> I saw >> you had comments on and I tested. Can we also make sure the crash fix I >> submitted >> in early January is in 1.10? I don't remember when it was branched. >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dev mailing list >> > dev@openvswitch.org >> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> dev@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
