On Feb 4, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:20:58PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: >> A few items were listed as arriving in 1.9.0, but they actually were new >> to 1.10.0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> > > I don't have any comments on the rearrangement, but I have some > suggestions for improvement overall. I guess that could be a separate > commit if you prefer.
Yeah, I think I'd prefer to treat them separately. I just sent a new patch. > > Here, s/Openflow/OpenFlow/: >> + - Openflow: D'oh! > The following is specifically related to tunneling, right? I don't > think that OVS influences path MTU otherwise: >> - Path MTU discovery is no longer supported. > Maybe we could merge this item into a "tunneling" section along with > "Tunneling requires the version of the kernel module paired with Open > vSwitch 1.9.0 or later." and "Inheritance of the Don't Fragment bit in > IP tunnels (df_inherit) is no longer supported." and anything else > that looks related to tunnels. > > This item won't be meaningful to most people: > - Patch ports are implemented in userspace. > How about "Patch ports no longer require kernel support, so they now > work with the kernel module built into Linux 3.3 and later."? > > 1.9 also has a number of tunneling-related changes that could be > grouped. I made these changes in the follow-up patch. --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
