On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:24:32PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
> > index 5c5d261..7732f49 100644
> > --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
> > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
>
> > @@ -5224,6 +5292,29 @@ send_packet(const struct ofport_dpif *ofport, struct
> > ofpbuf *packet)
> > int error;
> >
> > flow_extract(packet, 0, 0, NULL, OFPP_LOCAL, &flow);
> > + if (netdev_vport_is_patch(ofport->up.netdev)) {
> > + struct ofproto_dpif *peer_ofproto;
> > + struct dpif_flow_stats stats;
> > + struct ofport_dpif *peer;
> > + struct rule_dpif *rule;
> > +
> > + peer = ofport_get_peer(ofport);
> > + if (!peer) {
> > + return ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dpif_flow_stats_extract(&flow, packet, time_msec(), &stats);
> > + netdev_vport_patch_inc_tx(ofport->up.netdev, &stats);
> > + netdev_vport_patch_inc_rx(peer->up.netdev, &stats);
> > +
> > + flow.in_port = peer->up.ofp_port;
> > + peer_ofproto = ofproto_dpif_cast(peer->up.ofproto);
> > + rule = rule_dpif_lookup(peer_ofproto, &flow);
> > + rule_dpif_execute(rule, &flow, packet);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
>
> this and similar changes in this file break !LINUX_DATAPATH builds,
> where netdev-vport won't be built.
Thanks for reporting that.
There's nothing Linux-specific about the patch port implementation any
longer, so I guess we should build at least the patch port part of
netdev-vport everywhere.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
