Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for your quick reply, that provider much information for us and we can do our work accordingly. 2013/1/17 Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:18:14AM +0800, ?????? wrote: > > Q1: Can we contribute our modification for implementing OpenFlow spec > > 1.1+ message logic without the corresponding dpif logic? because we are > > developping hardware switch, we will not developping features that > support > > dpif, let's take OpenFlow 1.3 Group Mod message as an example. > > If the code you have is a starting point for generic group_mod support, > then we'd take it in that spirit. It is likely that we could not > actually apply the change to the master branch without adding basic > support to the ofproto-dpif provider. > > > Q2: Is it possible that we commit our ofproto provider (silicon bound) > to > > OVS to serve as a reference for hardware switch vendor who have interest > on > > porting OVS to hardware switch? > > That would be awesome. Yes, please, contribute it. >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
