From: Shan Wei <davids...@tencent.com>
just use more faster this_cpu_ptr instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, smp_processor_id());
Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davids...@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
---
net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 4 ++--
net/openvswitch/vport.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
index fd4a6a4..7b1d6d2 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void ovs_dp_process_received_packet(struct vport *p, struct
sk_buff *skb)
int error;
int key_len;
- stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+ stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
/* Extract flow from 'skb' into 'key'. */
error = ovs_flow_extract(skb, p->port_no, &key, &key_len);
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ovs_dp_upcall(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
err:
- stats = per_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu, smp_processor_id());
+ stats = this_cpu_ptr(dp->stats_percpu);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
stats->n_lost++;
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport.c b/net/openvswitch/vport.c
index 03779e8..70af0be 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/vport.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/vport.c
@@ -333,8 +333,7 @@ void ovs_vport_receive(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff
*skb)
{
struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
- stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
-
+ stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
stats->rx_packets++;
stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
@@ -359,7 +358,7 @@ int ovs_vport_send(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (likely(sent)) {
struct vport_percpu_stats *stats;
- stats = per_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats, smp_processor_id());
+ stats = this_cpu_ptr(vport->percpu_stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->sync);
stats->tx_packets++;
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
