Thanks, let me know if you need any more information from me.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:31:17PM -0600, Justin Pettit wrote: > Hi, Simon. I've confirmed the problem you found and am looking into it. > Unfortunately, I'm traveling this week for work, so I may have limited time > to look at it until Friday. > > Thanks for the report. > > --Justin > > > On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I believe I have found a regression that affects the behaviour of the > > datapath. A quick bisection points to the following patch: > > > > acf60855126bcfa79ea22d7846af5f2efe26cd30 > > ofproto-dpif: Use a single underlying datapath across multiple bridges. > > > > > > For my test I run Open vSwtich inside a kvm VM. Inside the VM > > there are two ethernet interfaces, eth0 and eth1 although only > > eth1 is used in this test. The interfaces are emulated and > > the other end of eth1 is tap1 in the host. > > > > eth1 has been added to an Open vSwtich bridge in the VM. > > The output of ovs-vsctl show is as follows: > > > > cff268ec-4e3d-41fa-8127-efa2bb851ae7 > > Bridge "br0" > > Port "eth1" > > Interface "eth1" > > Port "br0" > > Interface "br0" > > type: internal > > ovs_version: "1.9.90" > > > > When I try to from the host to the VM I obvserve that the VM > > does not respond to ARP requests. > > > > COnversely, when I try to ping from the VM to the host it appears > > that the VM ignores ARP responses. > > > > If I checkout acf60855126bcfa79ea22d7846af5f2efe26cd30^ then all seems well. > > If I checkout acf60855126bcfa79ea22d7846af5f2efe26cd30 I get the behaviour > > that I have described above. > > > > I have not debuged the problem any further yet. > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
