On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > I don't think memory issues are a real consideration here. The common > case is exactly one subfacet per facet. So I would do whichever you > think makes more logical sense. I think the subfacet is logically > a better location, but I can live with the facet too.
I don't disagree. I just sent out a v2 of this patch that makes the change. --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
