Hey Jesse, This sounds like a plan. It is pretty current (I think I last updated my github last week). I'll go ahead and update things, make sure things work, and apply your comments below.
Thanks! Kyle On Nov 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > Things are continuing to move along and I think that most of the major > infrastructure pieces are either complete or coming along nicely. One area > that might make sense for you to work on is the VXLAN dataplane support. I > know that you've been maintaining Ben's patch out of tree so hopefully there > isn't too much that needs to be done. In the past I was reluctant to apply > it on it's own but I think now that everything else is coming together it > makes sense. > > A couple things that come to mind that you might want to look into: > * Any updates to apply against master (it's looks pretty current but I'm > guessing that the recent header caching changes will require some updates). > * I think we probably want to make the destination port configurable as part > of the port properties from the database. Fixing it in the kernel seems a > little restrictive. > * It probably makes sense to use the skb rxhash and the ephemeral port range > to generate the source port as it is more similar to upstream. > > Thanks, > Jesse > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <[email protected]> > wrote: > Jesse and Pravin: > > Curious what the current state of the tunnel work is. About 4 weeks back, > Jesse had sent out an email with some work items. I have some cycles now to > continue working on this, but wanted to touch base with you guys to see where > things are at and what areas you may need help with. > > Thanks! > Kyle > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
