On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote: > I was considering to add a notification bus allowing for ovs-vsctl > to sleep and wait for a success or error notification and thus block > until the operation has been carried out by vswitchd or a timeout is > reached. It would be more flexible but also more intrusive and > complex. I doubt that adding ports is the only operation that is > affected by the above usability defect, right?
There is already means to wait until the operation is complete, and ovs-vsctl already uses that mechanism by default. You have to use "--no-wait" to disable it. You can already enable a timeout with "--timeout". -- "I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev