On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:03:32PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 17:18, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:54:28PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> >> > Does the 'argv' code in command-line.c actually malfunction on ESX?
> >> > It'd be nice to just leave it in, if not.  It's not really tied to
> >> > having the Linux datapath, it's orthogonal.  (It should actually work
> >> > on many Unix and Unix-like systems, but we specialize it to Linux
> >> > pending testing on other systems.)
> >>
> >> Yes I disabled it because I had verified that according to ps the
> >> process title was not set.
> >
> > OK, thanks.
> 
> Interesting - I didn't notice this code before.
> 
> On FreeBSD we have setproctitle(const char *fmt, ...) for this
> functionality, which has the same interface as proctitle_set.
> Unfortunately there's no decent way to pass the varargs through.
> 
> I could add an #elif defined(__FreeBSD__) case to command-line.c and
> use a temporary buffer in my proctitle_set implementation, or could
> just #define proctitle_set setproctitle in command-line.h.  Thoughts
> on which is preferable?

I'm happy enough with the latter; it's simpler, as long as it works.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to