On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:12:22AM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: >> Now that both the kernel and userspace can handle information about >> the tunnel outer headers this adds userspace support for communicating >> between the two. At the moment userspace doesn't know how to do >> anything with the extra information on receive and will only generate >> actions containing tun_id. However, both sides know how to ignore the >> extra information. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> > > What's your thought about how to handle the "XXX: need flags" bits? > (Or does a later patch address that? I haven't read ahead.)
The kernel interface in Kyle's first patch has a place for flags but doesn't actually define any yet. As I worked on the userspace portions I decided that it made sense to expose those three that are in userspace. We'll have to add them to the kernel interface as well since there's no way currently to translate in odp-util.c, which is what those XXX comments refer to. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
