On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:22:43AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: >> * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote: >>> On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> * Kyle Mestery (kmestery) (kmest...@cisco.com) wrote: >>>>> They are different, and not as flexible as the RHEL ones. >>>>> >>>>> Let me give the RHEL ones with the latest OVS a try on Fedora and see >>>>> what happens there, and based on the result of that I'll see about fixing >>>>> these >>>>> up as well. >>>> >>>> You should look at the Fedora packages. They won't build the kmod, but >>>> have all the Fedora-isms worked out. >>>> >>> I was thinking that's the way to go. If it's possible to unify the RHEL and >>> Fedora >>> ones upstream, I'll see about doing that. Otherwise, I'll submit patches for >>> Fedora specific spec files. >> >> Be prepared for systemd vs sysvinit differences at the very least. Also >> there's some packaging changes that make different (Build)Requires to >> be sure to have the right libraries and/or headers. > > Hmm, perhaps it's not worth unifying them. If so, I'm OK with that.
That's what I was thinking after looking at this as well. I'll proceed with separate ones for Fedora then. Thanks, Kyle _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
