Yes the standard is not completely defined yet but  Microsoft server 2012
has this protocol implemented and they are using the following commands to
allot VSIDs to the packet:

*New-NetVirtualizationLookupRecord -VirtualSubnetID “5001″ -CustomerAddress
“x.x.x.x” -ProviderAddress “y.y.y.y” -MACAddress “00155DE3F606″ -Rule
TranslationMethodEncap*

When implementing the protocol on OVS, is there some command which can
perform the same function as the command in MS 2012.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Saleha Asad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I am currently working on implementing NVGRE. I had certain questions in
> my
> > mind which I think could be cleared through discussion.
> > My understanding of NVGRE is that on the sender side when we add the
> NVGRE
> > header we set a particular VSID for the packet. This VSID is assigned on
> the
> > basis of the policy which contains a lookup table maintained by the
> > administrator. A lookup is performed and the VSID corresponding to the
> > particular MAC address and IP address is added in the NVGRE header and
> the
> > packet is sent on the tunnel. On the receiver side the VSID is extracted
> > from the NVGRE header and again a lookup is performed on the table
> > maintained at the receiver side. If the VSID of the receiving packet is
> > found from the table and the corresponding MAC and IP addresses are
> matched
> > then the packet is further processes otherwise discarded.
> > Please could anyone point out if I am wrong at some point or if I am
> missing
> > something. I wanted to know that what is the basis of this assignment of
> > VSID, are they just random 24 bit numbers set my the administrator or is
> > there some standard to follow while allotting VSIDs.
>
> I believe it's undefined but really the draft RFC is the authoritative
> source here.
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to