On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:06:23AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:42:48PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:02:51AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:07:55AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:55:36PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > > > > > > > I'm not really happy with this approach. It seems fairly awkward. I > > > > would much rather define some "struct ofputil_*" that has a superset of > > > > the 1.[012] table stats and define converter functions. > > > > > > Sure, I'll see what I can do. > > > I do agree that the approach I have taken is somewhat awkward. > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > is this closer to what you would like? > > Hi Ben, > > could you take a moment to look over this? > I'd like to know if this approach is appropriate.
Sorry, somehow I overlooked your earlier email. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
